Plato's study guide might makes right: this in turn gave way to an examination of the claim by thrasymachus that injustice is more profitable and . Justice is the interest of the stronger (might makes right) glaucon: but you have, socrates, and you, thrasymachus, need be under no anxiety about money, for we will all make a contribution for socrates. In book i, thrasymachus challenges socrates to refute the idea that “justice is the interests of the stronger,” a claim similar to what is meant when we say that “might makes right” thrasymachus’s point, reiterated by glaucon below, is that people do not willingly act ethically.
Thrasymachus originally defines might makes right in terms of the what is in the interest of those in power term what does socrates mean by the claim the unexamined life is not worth living. What thrasymachus actually claims at 339a is that justice is what is in the interest of the ‘established rule’ (τὸ τῆς καθεστηκυίας ἀρχῆς συ0φέρον), but although this might allow a distinction to be made between a ruling group (say, the aristocracy) and the members of that group (those who are the . Thrasymachus now says [in contrast to what he said earlier in the discussion] that doing injustice [wrong-doing] is being just [right-doing], whereas being unjust [wrong-doing] is doing justice the stronger are just only in so far as they are unjust.
Socrates is right - thrasymachus has not proved that it is essential to rulers that they rule subjects in the rulers' interest and not in the subjects' interest thrasymachus cannot rely on his general claim . Thrasymachus' argument is that might makes right but socrates rebuts this argument by demonstrating that, as a ruler, the ruler's chief interest ought to be the interests of his subjects, just as a physician's interest ought to be the welfare of his patient. Thrasymachus definition of justice in plato's republic essay this conclusion, thrasymachus makes three central claims about justice of natural right who . Thrasymachus enters the debate, answering that the very conception of justice is a sham meant to keep the strong at bay true justice, he contends, is the advantage of the stronger socrates tries to rebut thrasymachus’s claim, but thrasymachus remains unconvinced. Might is right – lecture 2 the difficulty with the first book of the republic is that the reader cannot be sure whether to take the argument seriously or not it is clear that many of socrates’ responses to his interlocutors are unconvincing.
Might makes right was an argument by thrasymachus in plato's republic also machiavelli wrote extensively about might makes right language is nothing more than shared normative conception that 2+3=5. Thrasymachus claimed that might makes right incidences where this position, might makes right, comes into play from a parents perspective it is important to have this role, to give guidelines, disciplines, and consequences to their children to give them the most stable . What are thrasymachus' arguments for might is right okay, so i'm writing a paper for my philosophy course on plato's republic the question is what are three arguments that thrasymachus uses to back up that justice is the advantage of the stronger. The treatments of thrasymachus’ argument by plato and smith demonstrate that we need not fall prey to the commonplace interpretation of the definition of justice as the interest of the stronger as a statement of crude realism of a calliclean or even proto-machiavellian variety that seems to laud the equation of might with right.
In plato’s republic, thrasymachus presents several arguments in favor of the position that “might makes right” explain three of his arguments do they explain how things are in the real world, how they ought to be or both. Like thrasymachus, marx sees a “might is right” world the ideas of marx and thrasymachus found a home in the frankfurt school, the school from which critical theory was born like marx, critical theory philosophy rejects the idea of justice because it rejects the existence of truth. Discussion on the republic exchange between socrates and thrasymachus' first argument justice is might makes right) regardless of op's claim of .
Thrasymachus asserts that tyranny: makes the doer of injustice happiest and the sufferers of it, who are unwilling to do injustice, most wretched  injustice, if it is on a large enough scale, is stronger, freer, and more masterly than justice 5 to decide whether an unjust man finds more happiness than a just man does, one must understand . A conventional description of justice may be that it is the conforming to some moral and social code when passing judgment to make the decision that favors what is perceived to be right thrasymachus seems to be challenging the very basic idea of justice when he claims that it serves only the stronger. Thrasymachus thought that might makes right because _____ justice is defined by whoever has the most power to value living an examined life assumes that _______. But, as i mentioned, the thesis of thrasymachus in that first book stands alone as the first attempt, so far as i know, to articulate the view that might makes right and it is a view that has a great many followers and adherents today.